Prev | Current Page 181 | Next

Reilly, S. A.

"Our Legal Heritage, 5th Ed."


15) And the citizens shall enjoy as good and full hunting
rights as their ancestors ever did, namely, in the
Chilterns, in Middlesex, and in Surrey.
Witnessed at Westminster."
The above right not to take part in any case outside the city
relieved London citizens from the burden of traveling to wherever
the King's court happened to be, the disadvantage of not knowing
local customs, and the difficulty of speaking in the language of
the King's court rather than in English. The right of redress for
tolls exacted was new because the state of the law was that the
property of the inhabitants was liable to the king or superior
lord for the common debt.
Newcastle-on-Tyne was recognized by the king as having certain
customs, so the following was not called a grant:
"These are the laws and customs which the burgesses of Newcastle
upon Tyne had in the time of Henry King of England and ought to
have.
[1] Burgesses can distrain [take property of another until
the other performs his obligation] upon foreigners within,
or without their own market, within or without their own
houses, and within or without their own borough without the
leave of the reeve, unless the county court is being held in
the borough, and unless [the foreigners are] on military
service or guarding the castle.


Pages:
169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193